The landlord opposed the renewal of the tenancy saying that it wanted to run a golf club on the land. The tenant replied, saying that the businees had little prospect of success. Held: Where the landlord had expressed intention to commence business from premises after expiry of the lease and wanted occupation, the court should … Continue reading Dolgellau Golf Club v Hett: CA 3 Apr 1998

As to the landlord’s intention to reconstruct the premises on opposing a renewal: ‘[a] man cannot properly be said to ‘intend’ to do . . work when he has not got the means to carry it out. He may hope to do so; he will not have the intention to do so.’ Judges: Denning LJ … Continue reading Reohorn v Barry Corporation: CA 1956

The defendant landlord rejected the claimant’s application for a new tenancy, saying that his own wife’s occupation of part of the premises for her business was sufficient to allow him to require possession. Held: there was no authority for the proposition that a business of a landlord’s wife would be sufficient for this purpose. It … Continue reading Zafiris and Another v Liu: CA 27 Jan 2005

When a landlord opposed a renewal of a business tenancy, the court must allow for changes in planning policy which affected the parties. Planning permission had originally been subject to a condition that it be used not by the claimant but by a tenant. That condition had been imposed under a policy which had now … Continue reading Gatwick Parking Service Ltd v Sargent: CA 3 Feb 2000

The landlord opposed the grant of a new tenancy. The business tenancy was an oral one, and he opposed renewal on the ground that the tenant was operating in breach of planning controls. Held: An illegal use is a reason connected with the tenant’s use and management of the holding and is a clear reason … Continue reading Turner and Bell v Searles (Stanford-le-Hope) Limited: 1977

The landlord said he resisted the grant of a new lease saying that he wanted to occupy the premises himself for his own business. He was also shown to have an untention to demolish the building. Held: An intention to demolish was inconsistent with an intention to occupy the premises for the landlord’s own business. … Continue reading Nursey v P Currie (Dartford) Limited: 1959

A landlord opposing the grant of a new tenancy on the basis that he wished to conduct his own business from the premises, need not show that everything is in place to conduct the new business, but must be able to show that most obstacles to starting the business have been dealt with. There is … Continue reading Gregson v Cyril Lord Ltd: CA 1962

The appellant is the landlord of business premises. The tenant, the respondent to this appeal, brought proceedings under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 for the grant of a new tenancy. The landlord resisted the application on the ground set out in section 30(1)(g), that he intended to occupy the premises for … Continue reading The Gulf Agencies Ltd v Ahmed: CA 3 Feb 2016

In September 1955 the landlords bought to adjoining shops which were about 250 years old and near the end of their life. They intended to undertake the demolition of the premises for which it was necessary to obtain possession, to rebuild on the site and to occupy the new buildings for the purpose of their … Continue reading Fisher v Taylors Furnishing Stores Ltd: CA 1956

The landlord objected to the renewal of the lease, saying that he intended to occupy the premises for his own business. The court had found that he intended to sell the property. Held: The landlord’s appeal failed. Parliament has not laid down any rule as to how long the landlord must intend to occupy the … Continue reading Patel and Another v Keles and Another: CA 12 Nov 2009