Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd: QBD 11 Feb 2010

The claimant had been employed by the defendant. He sought a payment of bonuses. The defendant sought to imply a term that for a discretionary bonus to be paid, the employee should not be under notice.

Judges:

Coulson J

Citations:

[2010] EWHC 375 (QB)

Links:

Bailii

Employment

Updated: 14 August 2022; Ref: scu.401925