RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller Gmbh and Company Kg (UK Production) No 2 – Order and Costs: SC 21 Jul 2010

The main judgment had not attempted to settle all issues between the parties, and much remained to be done. Any order would not be a final one. As to costs, each party had succeeded in one respect or another, but ‘at the end of this whole process RTS has had a significantly greater success than Muller.’ Though each side had made Part 36 offers, none had direct relevance to the appeal. RTS had already made some payments on account and it was correct that Muller should also now make an appropriate payment. Orders accordingly.
Lord Clarke said: ‘The general principles are not in doubt. Whether there is a binding contract between the parties and, if so, upon what terms depends upon what they have agreed. It depends not upon their subjective state of mind, but upon a consideration of what was communicated between them by words or conduct, and whether that leads objectively to a conclusion that they intended to create legal relations and had agreed upon all the terms which they regarded or the law requires as essential for the formation of legally binding relations. Even if certain terms of economic or other significance have not been finalised, an objective appraisal of their words and conduct may lead to the conclusion that they did not intend agreement of such terms to be a precondition to a concluded and legally binding agreement.’

Lord Phillips, President, Lord Mance, Lord Collins, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke
[2010] UKSC 38
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Principal JudgmentRTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller Gmbh and Company Kg (UK Production) SC 10-Mar-2010
The parties had reached agreement in outline and sought to have the contract formalised, but went ahead anyway. They now disputed whether an agreement had been created and as to its terms if so.
Held: It was unrealistic to suggest that no . .

Cited by:
CitedWells v Devani SC 13-Feb-2019
Mr W was selling apartments in a block of flats. Mr D, an estate agent, sought commission. W argued that D had not had signed his terms, and that therefore no contract existed. The court considered whether a contract had come into being when a major . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Costs

Updated: 10 January 2022; Ref: scu.421098