Roberts v Parole Board: Admn 19 Dec 2003

The prisoner had been convicted in 1996 of the murder of three police officers. His tariff had been fixed at 30 years. Material was to be placed before the parole board which was not to be disclosed to the appellant or his legal advisers. Instead it was proposed that special counsel should hear the material on his behalf.
Held: The proposed procedure was lawful.

Judges:

Maurice Kay J

Citations:

[2003] EWHC 3120 (Admin), [2004] 2 All ER 776, [2004] Prison LR 257

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Criminal Justice Act 1991 32

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromRoberts v Parole Board CA 28-Jul-2004
The discretionary life-prisoner faced a parole board. The Secretary of State wished to present evidence, but wanted the witness to be protected. The Parole Board appointed special counsel to hear the evidence on behalf of the prisoner on terms that . .
At First InstanceRoberts v Parole Board HL 7-Jul-2005
Balancing Rights of Prisoner and Society
The appellant had been convicted of the murder of three police officers in 1966. His tariff of thirty years had now long expired. He complained that material put before the Parole Board reviewing has case had not been disclosed to him.
Held: . .
CitedRoberts v Parole Board HL 7-Jul-2005
Balancing Rights of Prisoner and Society
The appellant had been convicted of the murder of three police officers in 1966. His tariff of thirty years had now long expired. He complained that material put before the Parole Board reviewing has case had not been disclosed to him.
Held: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Prisons

Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.189148