Site icon swarb.co.uk

Revenue and Customs v Sippchoice Ltd: UTTC 1 Mar 2017

Income : Scheme Sanction Charges – FA 2009 s 269 – whether scheme administrator reasonably believed that no unauthorised payment was being made – s 268(7)(a) – whether FTT erred in its interpretation and application of the test of reasonableness – Mobilx considered – whether FTT made an error of law in its findings of fact – Edwards v Bairstow

Citations:

[2017] UKUT 87 (TCC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Income Tax

Updated: 04 February 2022; Ref: scu.577821

Exit mobile version