UTTC VAT – MTIC fraud – whether FTT erred in law in its approach to the evidence and submissions – whether FTT erred in law in not giving proper weight to evidence of witnesses whose witness statements were unchallenged – whether FTT erred in law in refusing to admit certain evidence tracing money movements contained in a schedule evidenced in an unchallenged statement – whether FTT erred in law in making unspecified findings of fact
[2016] UKUT 350 (TCC)
Bailii
England and Wales
VAT
Updated: 24 January 2022; Ref: scu.570411