Site icon swarb.co.uk

Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v Mitchell: CACD 21 Jan 2009

Sentencing judges should be astute to ensure that they are satisfied that agreements on the amount to be recovered by way of confiscation orders are soundly based.

Judges:

Toulson LJ, McCombe, David Clarke JJ

Citations:

[2009] EWCA Crim 214, [2009] 2 Cr App R (S) 66, [2009] Crim LR 469

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedWhite and Others v Regina CACD 5-May-2010
The defendants appealed against confiscation orders made after a finding that they had been involved (separately) in the smuggling of tobacco, suggesting a conflict between the 1992 Regulations and the Directive.
Held: The appeals variously . .
CitedMackle, Regina v SC 29-Jan-2014
Several defendants appealed against confiscation orders made against them on convictions for avoiding customs and excise duty by re-importing cigarettes originally intended for export. They had accepted the orders being made by consent, but now . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Sentencing, Customs and Excise

Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.311779

Exit mobile version