Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v Wiggan: CACD 4 Feb 1999

The defendant appealed against her conviction for violent disorder saying that the judge’s interventions had been inappropriate and partisan.
Held: The appeal failed. A judge’s right to ask questions of a witness after re-examination must be limited to attempts to clarify matters raised already. He must not allow the impression to arise that he is cross-examining the witness. The judge here had crossed the line, but the other evidence was overwhelming and the conviction was not unsafe.

Judges:

Auld LJ, Forbes, David Steel JJ

Citations:

Times 22-Mar-1999, [1999] EWCA Crim 274

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Criminal Practice

Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: scu.85612

Exit mobile version