Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v Sullivan: CACD 1966

The defendant had refused to answer any questions at his trial. The court asked what significance could be atached to his exercise of this right if he was innocent.
Held: Authority showed in many cases that a court must not draw adverse inferences from an accused’s silence, but there were exceptions: ‘and this is one of them, in which the circumstances are such that it does not appear that there is any unfairness involved in the comment. The line dividing what may be said and what may not be said is a very fine one, and it is perhaps doubtful whether in a case like the present it would be even perceptible to the members of any ordinary jury. But there can be no doubt, on the authorities, that this court must hold that, in the present state of the law, what was said to the jury in the passage from the summing-up which has been cited amounted to a misdirection.’
References: (1966) 51 Cr App R 102
Judges: Lord Parker CJ, Salmon LJ and Fenton Atkinson J
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:

This case is cited by:

These lists may be incomplete.
Last Update: 27 November 2020; Ref: scu.192239 br>

Exit mobile version