Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v Sheehan and Moore: CACD 1975

The court approved a direction of law to the jury who had been asked to conclude that the voluntary consumption of alcohol by the defendant should lead to the conclusion that he was too drunk to form the intention required for proof of the crime alleged against him, is that ‘a drunken intent is still an intent.’

Citations:

[1975] 60 CAR 308, [1975] 1 WLR 739

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedGallagher, Regina v CACD 26-Mar-2007
The defendant appealed his conviction for rape, saying that other acquittals were inconsistent.
Held: They were not. Leave refused. . .
CitedRegina v Kingston HL 22-Jul-1994
Involuntary Intoxication not a General Defence
The prosecutor appealed an acquittal on appeal of the defendant for sexual assault, saying that he had not had the necessary intent because of intoxication through drink and drugs. He said that a co-defendant had secretly administered drugs to him. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime

Updated: 17 May 2022; Ref: scu.250548

Exit mobile version