Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Bostanci: QBD 13 Apr 1999

A person being interviewed as part of an application for asylum has no right as such to have his own interpreter present, just as he has no right to a lawyer. However the refusal of consent to an interpreter must be exercised only for good reason.

Citations:

Times 13-Apr-1999

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Immigration

Updated: 25 August 2022; Ref: scu.87834

Exit mobile version