The applicant, a Nigerian, applied for judicial review of the respondent’s decision not to revoke a deportation order. He had overstayed his limited leave. He wanted the respondent to refer new material back to the immigration authorities. The respondent refused to treat this request as a new application.
Held: A new ground for asylum arising after an application was rejected does not create a new appeal right.
Citations:
Independent 24-Jan-1996, Times 29-Jan-1996
Statutes:
Asylum and Immigration Appeals Act 1993 1
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex Parte Onibiyo CA 28-Mar-1996
More than one asylum claim may be made, but they must be sufficiently different to justify a second claim. The court considered when an application could be treated as having been finally determined and when it was necessary for the Secretary of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration
Updated: 26 May 2022; Ref: scu.87828