Regina v Rose and Others: CACD 1982

The court considered the effect of an irregularity in a trial and how it should be dealt with.


Lord Lane CJ


[1982] 1 WLR 614, [1982] 2 All ER 536


England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromRegina v Rose and Others HL 2-Jan-1982
Jurisdiction of CACD for Venire de Novo writ
The House considered what should be the consequences of a radical or fundamental error in the trial process, and whether there was jurisdiction in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division to order a venire de novo when the court was satisfied that a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 08 May 2022; Ref: scu.450343