Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v Poulson and Pottinger: CACD 1974

The trial judge said that he did not see how the press could report the evidence in the case without running the risk of being in contempt of other criminal proceedings which had already begun against Poulson and other defendants in respect of similar offences.

Judges:

Waller J

Citations:

[1974] Crim LR 141

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedIndependent Publishing Company Limited v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago, The Director of Public Prosecutions PC 8-Jun-2004
PC (Trinidad and Tobago) The newspapers had been accused of contempt of court having reported matters in breach of court orders, and the editors committed to prison after a summary hearing: ‘In deciding whether . .
CitedRegina v Horsham Justices ex parte Farquharson CA 1982
The Court was asked whether the justices had had power under section 4(2) to impose reporting restrictions on committal proceedings pending the trial to which they related..
Held: They had. A premature publication in contravention of a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice, Media

Updated: 06 May 2022; Ref: scu.198076

Exit mobile version