Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v McCluskey: CACD 4 Jun 1993

The consent of the Court of Appeal was needed to sanction any jury enquiry.

Citations:

Times 04-Jun-1993, (1994) 98 Cr App R 216

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedRegina v Durante CACD 1972
Logical inconsistency is generally an essential prerequisite for success of an appeal against conviction on the ground of inconsistency of verdicts. . .

Cited by:

CitedMuhib, Regina v CACD 13-Jan-1998
The defendant appealed against his conviction for manslaughter saying that the jury had returned inconsistent verdicts,
Held: ‘there is no possible logical inconsistency in the jury returning a verdict of manslaughter in relation to one victim . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 25 October 2022; Ref: scu.87304

Exit mobile version