Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v Mayling: 1963

To establish the offence of outraging public decency, it is not necessary to prove that any particular person was outraged.

Citations:

[1963] 2 QB 717, [1963] 47 Cr App R 102

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedRegina v Ching Choi CACD 7-May-1999
The defendant appealed his six convictions for outraging public decency. He had used a video camera and mirrors to record images of women using the toilet in a chinese supermarket. . .
CitedRose vDirector of Public Prosecutions Admn 16-Mar-2006
The defendant appealed his conviction for outraging public decency by behaving in an indecent manner contrary to common law. He had been in the foyer of a bank at night with a girl who performed oral sex. The action could have been seen, but was . .
CitedHamilton, Regina v CACD 16-Aug-2007
The defendant appealed his conviction for outraging public decency. He had surreptitously filmed up the skirts of women in a supermarket. The offence was only discovered after the films were found on a search of his home for other material. The . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime

Updated: 09 August 2022; Ref: scu.239593

Exit mobile version