Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v Kastercum: CACD 1972

The court considered when it might be appropriate to impose concurrent sentences: ‘where several offences are tried together and arise out of the same transaction, it is a good working rule that the sentences imposed for those offences should be made concurrent. The reason for this is if a man is charged with several serious offences arising out of the same situation and consecutive sentences are imposed, the total very often proves to be much too great for the incident in question. That is only an ordinary working rule; it is perfectly open to a trial judge in a case such as the present to approach this in one of two ways.’

Judges:

Lord Widgery CJ

Citations:

[1972] 56 CAR 298

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedRooney and Others, Re Attorney General’s Reference (Number 1 of 2005) CANI 11-Nov-2005
The defendants had been convicted or armed robbery. The Attorney General appealed against the sentences saying they were too lenient. Rooney argued that his plea of guilty had been after an indication by the judge and the reference was misguided. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Sentencing

Updated: 07 May 2022; Ref: scu.234985

Exit mobile version