Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v HM Treasury, Ex Parte University of Cambridge: ECJ 3 Oct 2000

When considering public law governed the procedural requirements for procurement contracts, the court had to consider whether body was financed ‘for the most part’ by public funds. The words referred to the majority of income, and the calculations of what was publicly financed was to include those sums received from government otherwise than for consideration by way of services or supplies. For an educational institution this would include funds by way of grants, but would not include payments for research and similar.

Citations:

Times 17-Oct-2000, C-380/98, [2000] All ER (EC) 920, [2000] 1 WLR 2514, [2000] EUECJ C-380/98

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Council Directive 92/50 relating to the co-ordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

CitedHampshire County Council v Beer (T/A Hammer Trout Farm); Regina (Beer) v Hampshire Farmers’ Market Ltd CA 21-Jul-2003
The applicant had been refused a licence to operate within the farmer’s market. It sought judicial review of the rejection, but the respondent argued that it was a private company not susceptible to review.
Held: The decisions of the Farmers . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Education

Updated: 04 May 2022; Ref: scu.162516

Exit mobile version