Regina v Clayton: CACD 1 Apr 2003

A confiscation order had (inter alia) been made after convictions for cheating the public revenue, but the notice of the proceedings had misdescribed the statutory basis.
Held: The mistake was procedural rather than substantial, and on the merits, the order need not be quashed.


Laws LJ


Times 11-Apr-2003, Gazette 12-Jun-2003


England and Wales


AppliedSekhon, etc v Regina CACD 16-Dec-2002
The defendants appealed against confiscation orders on the basis that in various ways, the Crown had failed to comply with procedural requirements.
Held: The courts must remember the importance of such procedures in the fight against crime, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 28 April 2022; Ref: scu.180962