The applicant sought review of the decision of the respondent that she had refused accommodation. She wanted to assert that they had failed to take account of her medical needs.
Held: The application had not proceeded at a proper case, but the parties disclosed a clear disagreement on the facts which the court was not able to resolve. The matter needed adjournment to allow cross-examination of witnesses.
Citations:
[1997] EWHC Admin 684
Links:
Citing:
Applied – O’Reilly v Mackman HL 1982
Remission of Sentence is a Privilege not a Right
The plaintiffs had begun their action, to challenge their loss of remission as prisoners, by means of a writ, rather than by an action for judicial review, and so had sidestepped the requirement for the action to be brought within strict time . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Housing
Updated: 26 May 2022; Ref: scu.137629