Regina v Calum I MacLeod: CACD 29 Nov 2000

The defendant had approached a prosecution witness after she had completed her evidence, but before she left, and challenged her on the basis that she had been lying. On the following day the judge considered whether his behaviour was a contempt of court, and having found it proved, and sentenced him. In this case, and the judge was not himself a witness to what had happened, and it was appropriate for him to act as an independent tribunal, and it was also necessary to act quickly and decisively. The Article 6 right to a fair trial did not add, in these circumstances, to the requirements which already applied to an English courts. The judge should, however, have requested prosecuting counsel to lead the witness through her evidence.

Citations:

Times 20-Dec-2000

Human Rights, Criminal Practice, Contempt of Court, Crime

Updated: 10 April 2022; Ref: scu.88549