Regina v Ashford Borough Council ex parte Shepway District Council: Admn 7 May 1998

The court set out the general rule in construing an outline planning permission which was clear, unambiguous and valid on its face. Regard could be had only to the planning permission itself and any conditions and the express reasons for them.
Keene J
[1999] PLCR 12, [1998] EWHC Admin 488
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedRegina (on the application of Reid and another) v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and another QBD 7-Oct-2002
Planning permission was granted subject to conditions. Later one condition was lifted on a renewed application. It referred to the earlier permission, but not the earlier conditions explicitly.
Held: The permission was not clear, and therefore . .
CitedBarnett v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government CA 23-Mar-2009
The Court was asked whether a planning permission granted permission for the use of a piece of land for purposes ancillary to a dwelling house, so that that land became part of the curtilage of the house, and permitted the construction of a tennis . .
CitedTrump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd and Another v The Scottish Ministers (Scotland) SC 16-Dec-2015
The appellant challenged the grant of permission to the erection of wind turbines within sight of its golf course.
Held: The appeal failed. The challenge under section 36 was supported neither by the language or structure of the 1989 Act, and . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 25 December 2020; Ref: scu.138609