Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina (Refugee Legal Centre) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: QBD 31 Mar 2004

The court declined to hold that the fast-track system of asylum adjudication at Harmondsworth Removal Centre was inherently unfair or therefore unlawful.

Judges:

Mr Justice Collins

Citations:

[2004] EWHC 684 (Admin), [2004] Imm AR 142

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appealed toThe Refugee Legal Centre, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department CA 12-Nov-2004
The applicant alleged that the fast track system of selecting and dealing with unmeritorious asylum claims was unfair and unlawful.
Held: The system was not inherently unfair and therefore unlawful and clear written instructions would suffice . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromThe Refugee Legal Centre, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department CA 12-Nov-2004
The applicant alleged that the fast track system of selecting and dealing with unmeritorious asylum claims was unfair and unlawful.
Held: The system was not inherently unfair and therefore unlawful and clear written instructions would suffice . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.195034

Exit mobile version