The deceased suffered depressive mental illness, and was detained outside on a cold night naked and in a cannabis induced delirium. Because of his size, additional officers were called upon to assist restraining him. He was taken to hospital, but died of a cardiac arrest whilst being restrained pending the arrival of a doctor. The family believed excessive force had been used. The coroner’s jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing. The officers asked the court to quash the verdict.
Held: The coroner would have been justified in not leaving the verdict of unlawful killing to the jury: ‘The evidence to support it was very tenuous and the absence of any criticism of the police was a telling point. But it was more likely that being held face down would have produced hypoxia and so it was open to the jury to find causation proved. It was vitally important that they should have received a careful direction so that they knew that it was only if the holding face down had contributed substantially to hypoxia and that hypoxia had contributed substantially to death that a verdict of unlawful killing could be found. They received no such direction. Thus I am just persuaded that the coroner did not err in law in leaving unlawful killing to the jury. Equally, he would not have erred if he had declined to leave it. ‘ However: ‘I have no doubt that a verdict of unlawful killing was not and would not be a just verdict.’ The verdict was quashed.
Judges:
Mr Justice Collins
Citations:
[2004] EWHC 2729 (Admin)
Links:
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Palmer v The Queen PC 23-Nov-1970
It is a defence in criminal law to a charge of assault if the defendant had an honest belief that he was going to be attacked and reacted with proportionate force: ‘If there has been an attack so that defence is reasonably necessary, it should be . .
Cited – Middleton, Regina (on the Application of) v Coroner for the Western District of Somerset HL 11-Mar-2004
The deceased had committed suicide in prison. His family felt that the risk should have been known to the prison authorities, and that they had failed to guard against that risk. The coroner had requested an explanatory note from the jury.
Cited – Regina v HM Coroner for Inner London South District, ex parte Douglas-Williams CA 29-Jan-1998
The deceased died in custody. The jury returned a verdict of accidental death. It was suggested that the coroner’s direction as to unlawful killing had been confusing, and that he was wrong not to leave open the possibility of a verdict of neglect. . .
Cited – Regina v Galbraith CCA 1981
Rejection of Submission of No Case to Answer
The defendant had faced a charge of affray. The court having rejected his submission of having no case to answer, he had made an exculpatory statement from the dock. He appealed against his conviction.
Held: Lord Lane LCJ said: ‘How then . .
Cited – Regina v HM Coroner for Inner London South District, ex parte Douglas-Williams CA 29-Jan-1998
The deceased died in custody. The jury returned a verdict of accidental death. It was suggested that the coroner’s direction as to unlawful killing had been confusing, and that he was wrong not to leave open the possibility of a verdict of neglect. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Coroners, Police
Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.220045