Site icon swarb.co.uk

Re Ravenseft Properties Ltd’s Application: 1978

A restriction in terms of the 1976 Act was not accepted merely by the agreement with the landlord. The tenant, in taking the lease, did not restrict a pre-existing freedom to trade on the demised premises, but rather obtained a new, but limited, freedom to trade there.

Judges:

Mocatta P

Citations:

[1978] 1 QB 52

Statutes:

Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1976

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

ConfirmedThe Football Association Premier League Limited, The Football Association Limited, The Football League Limited (And Their Respective Member Clubs) v British Sky Broadcasting Limited, British Broadcasting Limited RPC 28-Jul-1999
Agreements had been made controlling the broadcasting of football matches. The director general sought to challenge them as restrictive practices, since the individual clubs had signed away their right themselves to arrange for the broadcasting of . .
CitedWilliams, Williams v Kiley T/A CK Supermarkets Limited CA 21-Nov-2002
Tenants in a shopping precinct sought to enforce restrictive covenants directly against other tenants.
Held: The leases were in the same form, and covenants had been imposed to restrict the uses to avoid conflict. The scheme had the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant, Commercial

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.182972

Exit mobile version