Rawlinson and Hunter Trustees SA and Others v Director of The Serious Fraud Office: CA 31 Jul 2014

Documents had been disclosed in error in related proceedings, and the appellants now challenged refusal of an order that their use within the current proceedings should be restrained.

Judges:

Longmore, Moore-Bick, Gloster LJJ

Citations:

[2014] EWCA Civ 1129, [2015] 1 WLR 797, [2014] CP Rep 45

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedKadhim v Housing Benefit Board, London Borough of Brent CA 20-Dec-2000
A lower court was not bound to follow a decision of a higher court, where the decision at issue had been based, on the relevant point, on an unargued assumption about the law, which had in turn been pivotal to the decision of that higher court: ‘The . .

Cited by:

CitedFSHC Group Holdings Ltd v Glas Trust Corporation Ltd CA 31-Jul-2019
Rectification – Chartbrook not followed
Opportunity for an appellate court to clarify the correct test to apply in deciding whether the written terms of a contract may be rectified because of a common mistake.
Held: The appeal failed. The judge was right to conclude that an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.535456