Rasu Maritima SA v Perusahaan (the Pertamina): CA 1978

Section 45 of the 1925 Act gives the court a very wide discretion to grant an injunction.


Lord Denning MR


[1978] 1 QB 644


Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 45


AppliedBeddow v Beddow CA 1878
The power in the section embraced the grant of an injunction ‘in any case where it would be right or just to do so’. . .

Cited by:

CitedA J Bekhor and Co Ltd v Bilton CA 6-Feb-1981
The plaintiff had applied for disclosure of assets under the Rules of the Supreme Court in support of a Mareva freezing order. The rules were held not to provide any such power: disclosure of assets could not be obtained as part of discovery as the . .
CitedRank Film Distributors v Video Information Centre HL 1-Mar-1981
The plaintiffs claimed large-scale copyright infringement, and obtained Anton Pillar orders. The House considered the existence of the privilege against self-incrimination where the Anton Piller type of order has been made. The Court of Appeal had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.416372