Rassemblement Jurassien Unite Jurassienne v Switzerland: ECHR 10 Oct 1979

(Commission) The right to freedom of expression is one of the foundations of a democratic society. The subjection of meetings in public thoroughfares to an authorisation procedure did not normally encroach upon the essence of the right. The concern is that there should be an ability to hold a peaceful assembly.
(1979) 17 DLR 93, 8191/78, [1979] ECHR 7
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights
Human Rights
Cited by:
CitedCountryside Alliance and others, Regina (on the Application of) v Attorney General and Another HL 28-Nov-2007
The appellants said that the 2004 Act infringed their rights under articles 8 11 and 14 and Art 1 of protocol 1.
Held: Article 8 protected the right to private and family life. Its purpose was to protect individuals from unjustified intrusion . .
CitedJones and Lloyd v Director of Public Prosecutions Admn 23-Jan-1997
The appellants had been peacefully protesting at Stonehenge. They were among others who refused to leave when ordered to do so under an order made by the police officer in charge declaring it to be a trespassory assembly under the 1986 Act. They . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 10 February 2021; Ref: scu.276374