Site icon swarb.co.uk

Purohit v Hospira (UK) Ltd and Another: EAT 30 Aug 2012

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs
Three grounds of appeal, disparate in nature, arising out of a costs order.
The Tribunal’s reasons for not taking the Claimant’s means into account apparently left out of consideration her witness statement to the effect that she had no savings or investments; remitted for Tribunal to take this factor into account.
In all other respects, appeal dismissed.

Judges:

David Richardson J

Citations:

[2012] UKEAT 0182 – 12 – 3008

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 05 November 2022; Ref: scu.464611

Exit mobile version