Site icon swarb.co.uk

Procter and Gamble UK v Revenue and Customs (Including Supplemental Judgment): ChD 4 Jul 2008

Whether Regular Pringles are standard-rated as being within the words ‘potato crisps, potato sticks, potato puffs and similar products made from the potato, or from potato flour, or from potato starch’ in excepted item 5 of Group 1 of Schedule 8 to the VAT Act 1994.
Held: They were not potato products and were zero-rated for VAT.

Judges:

Warren J

Citations:

[2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch), Times 18-Jul-2008

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Value Added Tax Act 1994

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromProcter and Gamble (Uk) v Revenue and Customs VDT 25-Jun-2007
VDT ZERO-RATING – food – Excepted item 5 of Group 1 of Schedule 8 to the VAT Act 1994 – whether Pringles are similar to potato crisps – yes – whether they are made from the potato, potato flour or potato starch – . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromRevenue and Customs v Procter and Gamble UK CA 20-May-2009
The court was asked whether Pringles are ‘similar to potato crisps and made from the potato?’ Toulson LJ discussed the need for appellate courts to respect the special knowledge of tribunals: ‘Where a Tribunal has taken into account all relevant . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.270632

Exit mobile version