Site icon swarb.co.uk

Power v Panasonic (UK) Limited: EAT 9 Mar 2005

EAT Practice and Procedure – Costs. Costs order. Permissible option applying 2 stage exercise under R14(1) 2001 ET Rules.

Judges:

His Honour Judge Peter Clark

Citations:

[2005] UKEAT 0439 – 04 – 0903, UKEAT/0439/04

Links:

Bailii, EAT

Citing:

CitedTelephone Information Services v Wilkinson EAT 1991
The employee was dismissed. His employers offered to pay to him andpound;9,699, the maximum sum he could have been awarded if the matter went to the tribunal, but made no admission of liability. He rejected the offer, saying that he wanted the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment, Costs

Updated: 11 July 2022; Ref: scu.257332

Exit mobile version