Site icon swarb.co.uk

Poitrimol v France: ECHR 23 Nov 1993

Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Costs and expenses partial award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings

14032/88, (1993) 18 EHRR 130, [1993] ECHR 54, [1993] ECHR 54, [1993] ECHR 62
Worldlii, Bailii, Bailii
Human Rights
Cited by:
CitedMotorola Credit Corporation v Uzan and others (No 2) CA 12-Jun-2003
World-wide freezing orders had been made under the 1982 Act. The defendants were members of a Turkish family with substantial business interests in the telecommunications industry. In breach of orders made in the US some defendants had sought to . .
CitedGovernment of the United States of America v Barnette and another Admn 2002
The applicant sought to register, under the Act, an order against the funds of the defendant, who replied that the order sought to be registered had been obtained in a way which would infringe her human rights if obtained here. As a fugitive she had . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 05 January 2022; Ref: scu.165281

Exit mobile version