The claimant executed works for the defendant and claimed payment. There was a dispute about which documents made up the contract.
Held: The defendant had thought he accepted an offer which had already been withdrawn. The defendant was due to pay the sum shown on the first offer calculated by rate as described rather than the fixed (and much larger) sum in the second fax.
Arden, Dyson LJJ
[2003] EWCA Civ 1741
Bailii
England and Wales
Updated: 29 August 2021; Ref: scu.188481 br>