Judgment on applications by the First to Third Defendants for security for costs. The issue in dispute is not the question of security as such, since the Claimant, which is in administration, has agreed to provide security to all the Defendants. However, the First to Third Defendants seek security at a higher level than the 65% of their costs estimate which has been agreed by P4U with all the other Defendants. That is because these three Defendants submit that security should be ordered on the basis of a potential award of indemnity costs. P4U contends that this is inappropriate and that the standard basis, as applied in respect of the other Defendants, should be applied.
[2020] EWHC 1943 (Ch)
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Phones 4U Ltd v EE Ltd and Others ChD 17-Jul-2020
Various aspects of disclosure sought by the Claimant . .
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 01 July 2021; Ref: scu.652769 br>