Site icon swarb.co.uk

Paulsen-Medalen And Svensson v Sweden: ECHR 19 Feb 1998

Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 6-1 (first applicant); No violation of Art. 6-1 (second applicant); Not necessary to examine Art. 8; Not necessary to examine Art. 13; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings
16817/90, [1998] ECHR 11
Bailii
Human Rights

Updated: 29 July 2021; Ref: scu.165583 br>

Exit mobile version