Site icon swarb.co.uk

Patel v Clemence Hoar Cummings: EAT 26 Feb 2008

EAT Unfair dismissal – Mitigation of loss – Polkey deduction
Employee challenged the assessment of compensation. He submitted that the Tribunal had erred in its assessment of the Polkey reduction and its approach to mitigation. Moreover, its reasons had been deficient.
EAT held that the Tribunal had not misdirected themselves in law, nor reached a perverse conclusion. The reasons were clear and adequate. Accordingly the appeal was dismissed.

Judges:

Elias P J

Citations:

[2008] UKEAT 0605 – 07 – 2602

Links:

Bailii

Employment

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.266075

Exit mobile version