Site icon swarb.co.uk

Parry-Jones v The Law Society: CA 1969

The Society had, for regulatory purposes, exercised a power under the 1957 Act to call upon the plaintiff, a solicitor, to produce for inspection accounts and other information relating to the conduct of his clients’ affairs. He sought an injunction restraining the Law Society from requiring him to produce documents that were subject to legal professional privilege without the consent of the clients to whom the privilege related. The court considered the operation of legal professional privilege in disciplinary proceedings.
Held: The court confined the definition of legal professional privilege to the principle whereby a party can resist production of documents in a court of law. Legal advice privilege is a confidence which is created by an implied term in the contract between solicitor and client.
Diplock LJ said: ‘So far as Mr Parry-Jones’ point as to privilege is concerned, privilege, of course, is irrelevant when one is not concerned with judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings because, strictly speaking, privilege refers to a right to withhold from a court, or a tribunal exercising judicial functions, material which would otherwise be admissible in evidence.’

Judges:

Lord Denning MR and Diplock LJ

Citations:

[1969] 1 Ch 1

Statutes:

Solicitors Act 1957

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

DoubtedRegina v Special Commissioner And Another, ex parte Morgan Grenfell and Co Ltd HL 16-May-2002
The inspector issued a notice requiring production of certain documents. The respondents refused to produce them, saying that they were protected by legal professional privilege.
Held: Legal professional privilege is a fundamental part of . .
CitedThree Rivers District Council and others v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6) HL 11-Nov-2004
The Bank anticipated criticism in an ad hoc enquiry which was called to investigate its handling of a matter involving the claimant. The claimant sought disclosure of the documents created when the solicitors advised employees of the Bank in . .
CitedMcE, Re; McE v Prison Service of Northern Ireland and Another HL 11-Mar-2009
Complaint was made that the prisoner’s privileged conversations with his solicitors had been intercepted by the police.
Held: The Act made explicit provisions allowing such interception and set out the appropriate safeguards. The interceptions . .
CitedPrudential Plc and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and Another SC 23-Jan-2013
The appellants resisted disclosure to the revenue of advice it had received. It claimed legal advice privilege (LAP), though the advice was from its accountants.
Held: (Lords Sumption and Clarke dissenting) LAP applies to all communications . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Legal Professions

Updated: 31 July 2022; Ref: scu.219417

Exit mobile version