Click the case name for better results:

Parnalls Solicitors Ltd v The Commissioners for Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 10 Nov 2009

Corporation tax – lump sum paid for release of annuity – deductible expense – obligation to pay annuity assumed on transfer of partnership business – whether revenue or capital Citations: [2009] UKFTT 318 (TC), [2010] SFTD 284, [2010] STI 378 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Corporation Tax Updated: 05 October 2022; Ref: scu.409116

Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v Harvey: EAT 9 Feb 2012

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Exclusions including worker/jurisdiction One year’s continuous employment completed on employer’s first notice of dismissal but not on second notice. Second notice prevails; see Stapp; M-Choice. Employer’s appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider Claimant’s unfair dismissal claim. Judges: Peter Clark J Citations: [2012] UKEAT 0455 – 11 – 0902 … Continue reading Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v Harvey: EAT 9 Feb 2012

Lord Chancellor v Ian Henery Solicitors Ltd: QBD 8 Dec 2011

The court heard a challenge to arrangements within the graduated fees scheme for payment of defence lawyers, and in particular ‘when does a trial begin?’ and whether a case should be paid as a ‘trial’ or as a ‘cracked trial’. The trial had been arranged and brought on, but after the jury was sworn, the … Continue reading Lord Chancellor v Ian Henery Solicitors Ltd: QBD 8 Dec 2011

Harrington Scott Ltd v Coupe Bradbury Solicitors Ltd: ChD 29 Sep 2022

Professional Negligence – Solicitors – Loss of Opportunity To Pursue Claim To Trial – Damages – Defendant’s Application To strike out and for summary judgment Judges: His Honour Judge Hodge KC Sitting as a Judge of the High Court Citations: [2022] EWHC 2275 (Ch) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Professional Negligence Updated: 01 October … Continue reading Harrington Scott Ltd v Coupe Bradbury Solicitors Ltd: ChD 29 Sep 2022

Reeves and Co, Solicitors, Regina v: CACD 24 Mar 2011

The solicitors appealed against a wasted costs order. On the morning of the trial, they had produced further evidence leading to the collapse of the trial. Held: The appeal succeeded. The solicitors had not been given notice of the application, and on the facts there was no evidence sufficient to establish the required failure: ‘ … Continue reading Reeves and Co, Solicitors, Regina v: CACD 24 Mar 2011

Lord Chancellor v Mclarty and Co Solicitors: QBD 2 Dec 2011

The Lord Chancellor appealed against an order permitting the solicitors to make a substantial costs claim when defending two parties in a drugs case. The Costs Judge had allowed an uplift of 100% of the fee that he had determined by reference to an hourly rate. Judges: Burnett J Citations: [2011] EWHC 3185 (QB) Links: … Continue reading Lord Chancellor v Mclarty and Co Solicitors: QBD 2 Dec 2011

Dean and Dean Solicitors v DionissiouMoussaoui: CA 17 Nov 2011

The court considered the limited role of an appellate court, being vested only with jurisdiction to entertain questions of law when it considers a Tribunal’s decision on the question of costs. Mummery LJ said: ‘This court is not entitled to interfere with the ET’s discretion, even if, had it been exercising the ET’s discretion, this … Continue reading Dean and Dean Solicitors v DionissiouMoussaoui: CA 17 Nov 2011

Rowden v Dutton Gregory Solicitors: EAT 1 Mar 2001

Disability Discrimination – Disability. Citations: [2001] UKEAT 1116 – 00 – 0103 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Rowden v Dutton Gregory Solictors EAT 17-Dec-2001 EAT Disability Discrimination – Disability EAT Disability Discrimination – Disability. . . Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete. Employment, Discrimination Updated: … Continue reading Rowden v Dutton Gregory Solicitors: EAT 1 Mar 2001

Godfrey Morgan Solicitors Ltd v Cobalt Systems Ltd: EAT 31 Aug 2011

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – CostsWasted costs – Claim brought under contingency fee arrangements under which solicitors would not represent client at hearing but would require to be put in funds to instruct counsel – Claimant unable and unwilling, as should have been apparent if he had been properly advised, to engage counsel if claim … Continue reading Godfrey Morgan Solicitors Ltd v Cobalt Systems Ltd: EAT 31 Aug 2011

Connolly v Whitestone Solicitors: EAT 24 Jun 2011

EAT JURISDICTIONAL POINTS – Fraud and illegalityContract of employment – illegality in performance.An employee who knows that his assertion to be self employed is unsustainable and yet claims to the Revenue to be self employed misrepresents his own understanding of the position and acts in bad faith; it is contrary to public policy to lend … Continue reading Connolly v Whitestone Solicitors: EAT 24 Jun 2011

The Lord Chancellor v Alexander Johnson and Co Solicitors and Another: QBD 29 Jul 2011

The court was asked whether the respondents, a firm of solicitors and a barrister, are in respect of acting on behalf of Aaron Phillips in certain criminal proceedings entitled to fees payable under the Litigators’ Graduated Fee Scheme (GFS) or under the Very High Costs Cases (VHCC) scheme. The issue involves a point of interpretation … Continue reading The Lord Chancellor v Alexander Johnson and Co Solicitors and Another: QBD 29 Jul 2011

Symonds (T/A Symonds Solicitors) v Redmond-Ord: EAT 10 Jun 2011

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissalPRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – PerversityFinding of fact contrary to agreed evidence leading to Employment Tribunal preferring Claimant’s evidence to that of Respondent on central factual issue on which finding of constructive unfair dismissal.Applying Piggott v Jackson, per Lord Donaldson MR, [1992] ICR 85, 92D, appeal allowed and case remitted to … Continue reading Symonds (T/A Symonds Solicitors) v Redmond-Ord: EAT 10 Jun 2011

Community Law Clinic Solicitors Ltd and Others v Methuen: EAT 8 Apr 2011

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Striking-out/dismissalAGE DISCRIMINATIONA Claimant does not establish an inference of discrimination simply by showing that he has been dismissed and replaced by someone whose protected characteristics are different from his own. Since the Claimant had done no more than that in respect of the allegations of sex and race discrimination, the … Continue reading Community Law Clinic Solicitors Ltd and Others v Methuen: EAT 8 Apr 2011

Mirikwe v Wilson and Co Solicitors and Others: EAT 11 May 2011

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSALCosts. Award made without taking account of paying party’s means because (1) she did not attend the costs hearing (although in the court building) and (2) her conduct of the proceedings throughout had been ‘outrageous’. Held, on appeal: the decision was well within the wide ambit of the Tribunal’s discretion on costs. Judges: … Continue reading Mirikwe v Wilson and Co Solicitors and Others: EAT 11 May 2011

Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v The Legal Services Commission: Admn 25 May 2011

The claimant firm of solicitors sought judicial review of the defendant’s refusal of the award of a contract for the provision of legal aid services in the fields of immigration and asylum law. Judges: McCombe J Citations: [2011] EWHC 1323 (Admin) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Legal Professions Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.440575

Wilsons Solicitors v Johnson and Others: EAT 20 May 2011

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Wasted costsJudge made wasted costs order in respect of a CMD which she believed had been abortive because the Appellant solicitors had not properly prepared their case – Order upheld – Observations on desirability of tribunals expressly referring to the relevant principles in their reasons. Judges: Underhill P J Citations: … Continue reading Wilsons Solicitors v Johnson and Others: EAT 20 May 2011

In Re Wiseman Lee (Solicitors) (Wasted Costs Order) (No 5 of 2000): CACD 5 Apr 2001

Where a court proposed a wasted costs order it was obliged by the regulations to hear the party against whom the order was sought. An order was made allowing the solicitors to make representations before a date, but the final order was made without having heard any representations, and the engrossed order made no reference … Continue reading In Re Wiseman Lee (Solicitors) (Wasted Costs Order) (No 5 of 2000): CACD 5 Apr 2001

Levy v Solicitors Regulation Authority: Admn 25 Mar 2011

The solicitor appealed against an order of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. Held: Cranston J summarised the legal principles that apply on an appeal under section 49 of the 1974 Act: ‘An appeal lies to this court from the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal as of right, pursuant to section 49 of the Solicitors Act 1974. By section … Continue reading Levy v Solicitors Regulation Authority: Admn 25 Mar 2011

Jr Jones Solicitors v Legal Services Commission: ChD 16 Dec 2010

The claimants sought a declaration to the effect that their failure to obtain an immigration contract following a tendering process for the carrying out of publicly funded work was unlawful. Judges: Purle QC J Citations: [2010] EWHC 3671 (Ch) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Legal Professions, Legal Aid Updated: 03 September 2022; Ref: scu.430494

Hammond Suddard, Solicitors v Agrichem International Holdings Limited: CA 18 Dec 2001

The appellant sought staying the order for him to pay costs pending the results of an appeal, and the respondent sought security for costs in fighting the appeal, and a striking out in default of payment, and for security for payment of the judgement debt. The applicant company is a limited liability company registered in … Continue reading Hammond Suddard, Solicitors v Agrichem International Holdings Limited: CA 18 Dec 2001

Davidson-Hogg v Davis Gregory Solicitors and Another: EAT 15 Nov 2010

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSALCompensationPolkey deductionThe Claimant was unfairly dismissed on 8 November 2006. The Employment Tribunal found she would have been fairly dismissed or resigned on 16 January 2007 and awarded compensation for economic loss up to then but not thereafter. The EAT upheld this award for even if the manner of the dismissal made the … Continue reading Davidson-Hogg v Davis Gregory Solicitors and Another: EAT 15 Nov 2010

France v Freemans Solicitors and Another: QBD 15 Dec 2010

Application by the Defendants in this libel action for summary judgment, based on the submission that the very limited publications which took place were protected by qualified privilege and that there was no realistic prospect of the Claimant being able to establish malice against the Second Defendant. Held: Summary judgment in favour of the defendants. … Continue reading France v Freemans Solicitors and Another: QBD 15 Dec 2010

Dickins (T/A Chris Dickins Solicitors) v Virdee: EAT 16 Sep 2010

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Constructive dismissal PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs The Employment Tribunal did not err in finding the conduct of the Respondent breached the implied term of trust and the Claimant resigned for that reason. The employment status of the Claimant was not an issue at the Employment Tribunal and could not be … Continue reading Dickins (T/A Chris Dickins Solicitors) v Virdee: EAT 16 Sep 2010

Nixon v Ross Coates Solicitors and Another: EAT 6 Aug 2010

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity MATERNITY RIGHTS AND PARENTAL LEAVE – PregnancyUNFAIR DISMISSAL – Contributory faultThe Employment Tribunal which found in favour of the Claimant in part did not show apparent bias on five grounds, although it made errors of fact on two of them. Observations disapproving the Respondent’s showing … Continue reading Nixon v Ross Coates Solicitors and Another: EAT 6 Aug 2010

Wm A Merrick (Formerly T/A Wm A Merrick and Co Solicitors) v Simpson: EAT 20 Aug 2010

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Striking-out/dismissal Preliminary issues Issue as to whether Claimant was dismissed under s95(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996 for purpose of her unfair dismissal claim ought to be dealt with as a preliminary issue at a PHR, rather than at a full merits hearing. Plainly it should on the basis of the Respondent’s … Continue reading Wm A Merrick (Formerly T/A Wm A Merrick and Co Solicitors) v Simpson: EAT 20 Aug 2010

Re Z (restraining solicitors from acting): FD 21 Dec 2009

Application by a husband, the respondent in the wife’s divorce proceedings, by which he seeks an order that the wife’s solicitors be debarred from acting any further for her in the divorce or financial matters and that they do remove themselves from the court record. Judges: Bodey J Citations: [2010] Fam Law 458, [2009] EWHC … Continue reading Re Z (restraining solicitors from acting): FD 21 Dec 2009

Simpson v Wm A Merrick (Formerly T/A W A Merrick and Co Solicitors): EAT 7 May 2010

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Preliminary issues Employer entitled to counterclaim under Article 4 Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) England and Wales Order 1994 when a bankrupt Claimant makes a claim for damages under s3(2) Employment Act 1996 whether or not claim is a nullity because Claimant has not obtained permission of the official receiver … Continue reading Simpson v Wm A Merrick (Formerly T/A W A Merrick and Co Solicitors): EAT 7 May 2010

Scott v Matthew Arnold and Baldwin Solicitors: EAT 19 May 2010

EAT UNFAIR DISMISSAL – Reasonableness of dismissal PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Bias, misconduct and procedural irregularity In this unfair dismissal claim, the Employment Tribunal did not err in its approach to the Claimant’s claim that the Respondent failed to deal with her grievance and so broke the implied term. As a matter of fact the … Continue reading Scott v Matthew Arnold and Baldwin Solicitors: EAT 19 May 2010

Ward Hadaway Solicitors v Love and Others (Rev 1): EAT 25 Mar 2010

EAT TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS: Service Provision Change When the NMC after competitive tender gave a new contract for future solicitors’ regulatory services to Capsticks, and none of the work in progress was handed over by Ward Hadaway, and no employee transferred, there was no service provision change under new TUPE 2006. Employment Tribunal Judgment upheld. … Continue reading Ward Hadaway Solicitors v Love and Others (Rev 1): EAT 25 Mar 2010

Silvera v Bray Walker Solicitors (A Firm) and Another: CA 29 Mar 2010

The defendant sought to appeal against orders for him to pay to his former solicitors sums for litigation undertaken by them under conditional fee agreements. Judges: Pill, Wilson, Richards LJJ Citations: [2010] EWCA Civ 332, [2010] 4 Costs LR 584 Links: Bailii Statutes: Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 (S.I.2000/692) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Legal Professions, … Continue reading Silvera v Bray Walker Solicitors (A Firm) and Another: CA 29 Mar 2010

Franco v Bowling and Co Solicitors: EAT 18 Dec 2009

EAT SEX DISCRIMINATION: CONTINUING ACT An Employment Judge at a CMD has no power to limit a claim of sex discrimination, said to be of a continuing act extending back for the 6 years of the Claimant’s employment, to the last 2 years. Citations: [2009] UKEAT 0280 – 09 – 1812 Links: Bailii Employment, Discrimination … Continue reading Franco v Bowling and Co Solicitors: EAT 18 Dec 2009

Akodu v Solicitors Regulation Authority: Admn 13 Nov 2009

Judges: Moses LJ, Tomlinson J Citations: [2009] EWHC 3588 (Admin) Links: Bailii Cited by: Cited – Bass and Another v Solicitors Regulation Authority Admn 18-Jul-2012 The appellants challenged the decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal finding them in breach of the 1998 Rules in that they had failed to prevent a former partner making unauthorised, … Continue reading Akodu v Solicitors Regulation Authority: Admn 13 Nov 2009

Nahome and Others v Last Cawthra Feather Solicitors: ChD 29 Jan 2010

The claimants said that the defendant firm of solicitors had acted negligently and in breach of contract in failing to secure the renewal of their business lease. A notice had omitted the word ‘not, and falsely indicated that possession would be granted. Liability having been entered the parties now disputed the damages to be awarded. … Continue reading Nahome and Others v Last Cawthra Feather Solicitors: ChD 29 Jan 2010

Ete v Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd: Admn 1 Aug 2022

appeal from an order of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal that the Appellant be struck off the Roll of Solicitors. Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Linden Citations: [2022] EWHC 2070 (Admin) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Legal Professions Updated: 11 August 2022; Ref: scu.679795