Click the case name for better results:

Mahmood and Another, Regina v: CACD 26 Aug 2005

Citations: [2005] EWCA Crim 2168 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Berr, Regina (on the Prosecution of) v Lowe CACD 17-Feb-2009 The defendant appealed against a confiscation order, alleging abuse of process by the prosecution. He had transferred land from the company just before it … Continue reading Mahmood and Another, Regina v: CACD 26 Aug 2005

Wood, Rex v: CACD 20 Sep 2022

Judges: Lord Justice Stuart-Smith Mrs Justice May DBE The Recorder of London (His Honour Judge Lucraft QC) (Sitting as a Judge of the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) Citations: [2022] EWCA Crim 1243, [2022] WLR(D) 377 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 22 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 06 October … Continue reading Wood, Rex v: CACD 20 Sep 2022

Stanford International Bank Ltd v Director of The Serious Fraud Office: SC 15 Feb 2012

The Court heard an interim application to decide whether an appeal to the Supreme Court existed under the 2002 Act. A restraint order had been made as to the appellants assets. Held: The statutory provisions substituting the Supreme Court for the House of Lords had omitted to deal with the 2005 Order appeal provisions. Leave … Continue reading Stanford International Bank Ltd v Director of The Serious Fraud Office: SC 15 Feb 2012

Shah and Another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd: CA 30 Nov 2011

Appeal against refusal of permission to amend pleadings. The claimants suffered large losses after the bank delayed implementing his instructions after staff members initiated a report under the 2002 Act. The claimant said that the evidence supporting a claim that the report was made in bad faith had only just come to light. Held: The … Continue reading Shah and Another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd: CA 30 Nov 2011

Crown Prosecution Service (Decision Notice): ICO 28 Jun 2010

The CPS was asked to provide information about its civil recovery functions under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. It refused, citing the exemption at section 35(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The Commissioner concluded that whilst section 35(1)(a) was engaged by the information, the public interest did not support withholding the information … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service (Decision Notice): ICO 28 Jun 2010

The Scottish Ministers v Stirton: SCS 24 Jan 2012

Citations: [2012] ScotCS CSOH – 15 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: Scotland Citing: See Also – Scottish Ministers v Stirton and Another SCS 5-Feb-2008 Application for an interim administration order in terms of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and for warrant for inhibition and arrestment . . See Also – Scottish Ministers v Stirton and Another … Continue reading The Scottish Ministers v Stirton: SCS 24 Jan 2012

OB v The Director of The Serious Fraud Office: CACD 1 Feb 2012

The court was asked whether a breach of an order under section 41 of the 2002 Act was a civil or a criminal contempt of court. The defendant had fled to the US to avoid complying with restraint orders on being investigated for financial fraud. He had been found guilty of contempt after fleeing. Held: … Continue reading OB v The Director of The Serious Fraud Office: CACD 1 Feb 2012

Re Stanford International Bank Ltd: Misc 16 Jan 2012

Reasons for order releasing funds from sums subject to restraint order. Judges: Gloster J DBE Citations: [2012] EW Misc 1 (CCrimC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005 Cited by: See Also – Stanford International Bank Ltd v Director of The Serious Fraud Office SC 15-Feb-2012 The Court … Continue reading Re Stanford International Bank Ltd: Misc 16 Jan 2012

Amir and Another, Regina v: CACD 23 Nov 2011

Akhtar had arranged with a mortgage broker to obtain money from lenders by submitting false mortgage applications on behalf of third parties. He was prosecuted under section 328. The prosecution argued that Akhtar was guilty because he entered into an arrangement which he knew would facilitate the acquisition of property for third parties by deception, … Continue reading Amir and Another, Regina v: CACD 23 Nov 2011

Regina v Long: CACD 15 Mar 2011

The defendant appealed against his conviction for money laundering. He had paid through his bank account a sum derived from a fraud. Judges: Aikens LJ, Keith, Thirlwall JJ Citations: [2011] EWCA Crim 767, [2011] Lloyd’s Rep FC 416 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 328(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 26 September … Continue reading Regina v Long: CACD 15 Mar 2011

Sandhu v Chief Constable of The West Midlands Police: Admn 5 Nov 2019

This appeal raises issues as to what must be proved before a magistrates’ court can make an order for forfeiture of cash pursuant to section 298(2)(b) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Citations: [2019] EWHC 3316 (Admin) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Magistrates, Criminal Practice Updated: 25 September 2022; Ref: scu.645827

Morgan v Regina; Bygrave v Regina: CACD 20 Jun 2008

The court considered the circumstances under which it might exercise its jurisdiction to prevent an abuse of process in confiscation proceedings. The circumstances where a confiscation might be oppressive are: ‘where demonstrably (i) the defendant’s crimes are limited to offences causing loss to one or more identifiable loser(s), (ii) his benefit is limited to those … Continue reading Morgan v Regina; Bygrave v Regina: CACD 20 Jun 2008

Dare v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 13 Jul 2012

The defendant appealed from his conviction under section 328. He had been arranging to buy what he admitted he thought may be a stolen car. Held: The parties had nor reached agreement even as to the purchase price, and no further steps had been taken to identify a sub-purchaser. The conviction was quashed. Judges: Bean … Continue reading Dare v Crown Prosecution Service: Admn 13 Jul 2012

Pattison, Regina v: CACD 13 Jun 2007

Appeal against confiscation order. Judges: Toulson LJ, Walker J, Wadsworth QC HHJ Citations: [2008] 1 Cr App R (S) 51, [2008] Crim LR 62, [2007] EWCA Crim 1536 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 328(1) 329(1) Criminal Sentencing Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.440356

Regina v Johal: CACD 19 Apr 2013

The defendant appealed against a confiscation order made on his conviction for possession of a Class B controlled drug. There had been considerable delays in the completion of the process, and it had exceeded the two year limit. The appellant argued that exceptional circumstances had not existed. The court had, of its own motion, adjourned … Continue reading Regina v Johal: CACD 19 Apr 2013

Iqbal v South Bedfordshire Magistrates Court: Admn 23 Feb 2011

The claimant challenged a decision authorising detention of a sum of cash, saying that the application had been made out of time. Judges: Pill LJ, Supperstone J Citations: [2011] EWHC 705 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 295(2) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 04 September 2022; Ref: scu.431265

Angus v United Kingdom Border Agency: Admn 11 Mar 2011

The appellant appealed by case stated against an order for forfeiture of andpound;40,000 cash seized by the respondent on her entering the UK. The Crown Court, on appeal from the Magistrates Court, had found that that cash ‘may well have been’ the proceeds of money laundering or of income tax evasion, but it made no … Continue reading Angus v United Kingdom Border Agency: Admn 11 Mar 2011

Crown Prosecution Service v Neish: CACD 6 May 2010

The defendant faced confiscation proceedings. The judge gave instructions to the listing office to give a later date for the hearing. The defendant said that the delay took the case out of the court’s jurisdiction to make an order. Held: The judge’s act was in itself a valid postponment so as to extend the time … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service v Neish: CACD 6 May 2010

Regina v Donohoe: CACD 28 Jul 2006

The defendant appealed against the making of a confiscation order, saying that the court had erred in the procedure for forfeiting drugs. Held: The appeal failed. The section contained an express prohibition against making both a forfeiture and a confiscation order. However the object of the act should not be frustrated by the erroneous imposition … Continue reading Regina v Donohoe: CACD 28 Jul 2006

Sachan, Regina v: CACD 9 Nov 2018

Consequences of a failure to comply with the provisions of section 15(2) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Citations: [2018] EWCA Crim 2592, [2019] 4 WLR 67 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.630983

Windsor and Others v Crown Prosecution Service: CACD 8 Feb 2011

The appellants challenged restraint and receivership orders made against them under the 2002 Act. Judges: Hooper LJ, Openshaw J, Sir Geoffrey Grigson Citations: [2011] EWCA Crim 143, [2011] Lloyd’s Rep FC 204, [2011] 2 Cr App R 7, [2011] WLR (D) 4 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Windsor and Others v Crown Prosecution Service: CACD 8 Feb 2011

Shah and Another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd: QBD 16 May 2012

The Claimants claimed damages in a sum in excess of US$300,000,000 arising out of delays by the Defendant, their bankers, in executing four transfers from the Claimants’ account during the period September 2006 to March 2007 and the Defendant’s failure to explain the reasons for such delays. Judges: Supperstone J Citations: [2012] EWHC 1283 (QB), … Continue reading Shah and Another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd: QBD 16 May 2012

Shah and Another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd: QBD 4 Jul 2011

The claimants sought very substantial damages against the bank, arising from the bank’s delay in executing four transactions. The defendant said that it suspected that the proposed transactions concerned criminal property and that, in those circumstances, they were not required to comply with the payment instructions. The claimant complained at this point of the redaction … Continue reading Shah and Another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd: QBD 4 Jul 2011

White and Others v Regina: CACD 5 May 2010

The defendants appealed against confiscation orders made after a finding that they had been involved (separately) in the smuggling of tobacco, suggesting a conflict between the 1992 Regulations and the Directive. Held: The appeals variously failed and succeeded according to their facts. A person obtains a pecuniary advantage by evading duty or VAT even though … Continue reading White and Others v Regina: CACD 5 May 2010

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Crown Court Sitting At Croydon: Admn 24 Mar 2010

The minister appealed against an order dismissing an application for a confiscation order as an abuse of process. The defendant had earlier had been told that no application would be made. Judges: Toulson, Griffith Williams JJ Citations: [2010] EWHC 805 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Social Security Administration 1992 111A(1) Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Crown Court Sitting At Croydon: Admn 24 Mar 2010

In re M (Restraint order: Reasonable living expenses): CACD 22 May 2009

The court had allowed as exception to a criminal restraining order his reasonable living expenses. He sought an order allowing him to pay his legal aid contribution from those expenses. Held: The section allowed reasonable living expenses as an exemption, but did not allow payments of contributions as a condition of his grant of public … Continue reading In re M (Restraint order: Reasonable living expenses): CACD 22 May 2009

Regina v M (Restraint order: Jurisdiction): CACD 14 Aug 2008

The defendant appealed against a decision that he should face a prosecution for contempt of court for breach of a restraint order. Held: The court did have the jurisdiction to deal with such a complaint. Judges: Toulson LJ, Mr Justice Andrew Smith LJ, Bean J Citations: Times 24-Oct-2008 Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 41 … Continue reading Regina v M (Restraint order: Jurisdiction): CACD 14 Aug 2008

Wilkinson, Regina v: CACD 11 Dec 2009

The court considered the effect of the decision in Clarke, and concluded that if the court is not permitted to make a confiscation order together with an order for conditional discharge, it may then become necessary to impose a different, more punitive sentence, rather than the order for conditional discharge, because without the order for … Continue reading Wilkinson, Regina v: CACD 11 Dec 2009

Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski and Others: ChD 19 Mar 2009

The applicant defendants sought to have excluded from the effect of restrictions on their dealing with property, property which was held under trusts. Held: The applications were rejected. There were well established rules allowing trustees indemnity in appropriate cases from the trust funds, and parliament had intended the 2002 Act to cover both personal and … Continue reading Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski and Others: ChD 19 Mar 2009

Szepietowski v Assets Recovery Agency: Admn 28 Nov 2006

The first respondent applied for the freezing and receiving orders in relation to two properties and chattels obtained by the first respondent under the 2002 Act to be discharged on the footing that the Agency Director has not shown that she has a good arguable case that the property is, or includes, recoverable property as … Continue reading Szepietowski v Assets Recovery Agency: Admn 28 Nov 2006

Director of the Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski and others: Admn 29 Sep 2006

The respondent had objected that the appointment of an interim receiver had been based upon information obtained in the course of investigations undertaken in connection with different proceedings and allegations. Held: The enforcement agency was not prevented from using such information in this way, and was entitled to a declaration accordingly. Judges: Mr Justice Silber … Continue reading Director of the Assets Recovery Agency v Szepietowski and others: Admn 29 Sep 2006

Durojaiye, Regina (on The Application of) v Crown Court At Croydon: Admn 6 Jul 2022

This is an application for judicial review of a search and seizure warrant granted under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 on the grounds that there was material non-disclosure by the police in applying for the warrant. Judges: Lord Justice Bean Mr Justice Sweeting Citations: [2022] EWHC 1736 (Admin) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Durojaiye, Regina (on The Application of) v Crown Court At Croydon: Admn 6 Jul 2022

Haque, Regina v: CACD 23 May 2019

Consideration of some of the provisions relating to offences of money laundering set out in the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Citations: [2019] EWCA Crim 1028, [2020] 1 WLR 2239, [2020] WLR(D) 49 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 329(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 03 August 2022; Ref: scu.639305

Crown Prosecution Service (Durham) v Nelson; CPS v Pathak; CPS v Paulet: CACD 28 Jul 2009

Nelson had been found possessing a stolen digger worth andpound;14,000. It was returned to the owner. He was to receive andpound;1,000 for supplying documents for it. Pathak used monet stolen from his employers to purchase property, but had repaid the money stolen. The property was ordered to be confiscated. Paulet as an immigrant had worked … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service (Durham) v Nelson; CPS v Pathak; CPS v Paulet: CACD 28 Jul 2009

Wilkinson, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 22 Jun 2006

The defendant sought judicial review of the decision to charge him under the Act for being in possession of a stolen motor-cycle. He said he had been over-charged. Held: Unlike a conviction for handling stolen goods, the offence under the 2002 Act did not require the defendant to know that the object was stolen. ‘if … Continue reading Wilkinson, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 22 Jun 2006

Clarke v Regina: CACD 12 Jun 2009

The defendant had pleaded guilty to concealing criminal property. He was conditionally discharged but also made subject to a confiscation order. He appealed saying that one could not be made if only a conditional discharge was imposed. Held: The defendant’s appeal succeeded. The court examined the history of the conditional discharge provided by counsel, and … Continue reading Clarke v Regina: CACD 12 Jun 2009

Crown Prosecution Service v Moulden: CACD 11 Nov 2008

Prosecution appeal against confiscation orders imposed against the defendant. Held: The prosecutor’s appeal failed. The phrase ‘proceedings before the crown court’ referred to matters within one indictment, and did not refer to all matters which might be listed against a defendant on the same day.Prosecution appeal against confiscation orders Judges: Lord Justice Pill, Mr Justice … Continue reading Crown Prosecution Service v Moulden: CACD 11 Nov 2008

Horne and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Central Criminal Court: Admn 22 May 2012

All three claimants challenged the issue of a disclosure order and Gayle Horne challenged the issue of search warrants issued under Part 8 of the 2002 Act. The search warrants were issued under s.352 POCA and the disclosure order under s.357 POCA, pursuant to orders of His Honour Judge Forrester at the Central Criminal Court … Continue reading Horne and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v The Central Criminal Court: Admn 22 May 2012

Smale, Regina v: CACD 30 Apr 2008

The defendants appealed against sentences of imprisonment after being convicted of assisting a family member to hide assets after his conviction for cocaine importation. Held: The sentences were reduced. Judges: Toulson LJ, Royce J, Baker QC HHJ Citations: [2008] EWCA Crim 1235, [2009] 1 Cr App Rep (S) 25 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime … Continue reading Smale, Regina v: CACD 30 Apr 2008

Scottish Ministers v Stirton and Another: SCS 30 Apr 2009

Citations: [2009] ScotCS CSOH – 61 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: Scotland Citing: See Also – Scottish Ministers v Stirton and Another SCS 5-Feb-2008 Application for an interim administration order in terms of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and for warrant for inhibition and arrestment . . Cited by: See Also – The Scottish Ministers v … Continue reading Scottish Ministers v Stirton and Another: SCS 30 Apr 2009

Perinpanathan v City of Westminster Magistrates Court: Admn 10 Mar 2009

The claimant had successfully defended a forfeiture case, but had been refused an order for her costs by the magistrates. The magistrates had found that the case had been properly brought under the 2002 Act, even though it had failed. Held: The request for judicial review failed. Citations: [2009] EWHC 762 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: … Continue reading Perinpanathan v City of Westminster Magistrates Court: Admn 10 Mar 2009

King v Director of the Serious Fraud Office: HL 18 Mar 2009

Authorities in South Africa sought assistance in recovering what they said were assets acquired in England and Scotland with the proceeds of crime in South Africa, and in particular a restraint order, an assets declaration and other investigative assistance. The Court of Appeal had restricted the ambit of the order to exclude Scotland. Held: The … Continue reading King v Director of the Serious Fraud Office: HL 18 Mar 2009

Luckhurst, Regina v: CACD 24 Nov 2020

‘This appeal raises issues of principle as to the scope of living and legal expenditure which should be permitted by restraint orders granted pursuant to s. 41 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ‘ Judges: Lord Justice Popplewell Citations: [2020] EWCA Crim 1579 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 41(4) Jurisdiction: England and Wales … Continue reading Luckhurst, Regina v: CACD 24 Nov 2020

Luckhurst, Regina v: SC 20 Jul 2022

Judges: Lord Hodge, Deputy President Lord Kitchin Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows Lord Stephens Citations: [2022] UKSC 23 Links: Bailii, Bailii Summary, Bailii Issues/Facts Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Appeal from – Luckhurst, Regina v CACD 24-Nov-2020 ‘This appeal raises issues of principle as to the scope of living and legal expenditure which should be permitted … Continue reading Luckhurst, Regina v: SC 20 Jul 2022

Islam, Regina v: CACD 31 Jul 2008

Judges: Lord Justice Toulson, Mr Justice Jack and Judge Michael Mettyear Citations: [2008] EWCA Crim 1740 Links: Bailii Statutes: Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 170(2), Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 79 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Appeal from – Islam, Regina v HL 10-Jun-2009 The defendant appealed against a confiscation order saying that … Continue reading Islam, Regina v: CACD 31 Jul 2008

Director of Assets Recovery Agency and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Green and others: Admn 16 Dec 2005

The defendant challenged the making of civil orders for recovery of what were alleged to be the proceeds of crime. They complained that no specific offence had been made out. The court was asked, as a preliminary issue: ‘Whether a claim for civil recovery can be determined on the basis of conduct in relation to … Continue reading Director of Assets Recovery Agency and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Green and others: Admn 16 Dec 2005

Commissioner of Police for The City of London, Regina (on The Application of) v City of London Magistrates’ Court and Another: Admn 29 Apr 2015

The Commissioner sought judicial review (with permission) of an order made by Magistrates in effect that the police should release cash, which was the subject of a forfeiture application under section 298 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, to the interested party to fund his criminal defence. Because the forfeiture proceedings were outstanding such … Continue reading Commissioner of Police for The City of London, Regina (on The Application of) v City of London Magistrates’ Court and Another: Admn 29 Apr 2015

Irwin Mitchell v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office and Allad: CACD 30 Jul 2008

The solicitors had been paid funds on account of their fees in defending the client. By the time a freezing order was made under the 2002 Act in respect of his assets, the firm’s fees exceeded the amount held. The court was asked what was to happen to the funds. The solicitors had not yet … Continue reading Irwin Mitchell v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office and Allad: CACD 30 Jul 2008

Greater Manchester Police, Regina (on the Application of) v City of Salford Magistrates Court: Admn 21 Jul 2008

Sums of money had been found on a raid on factory premises where many illegal workers were found. The company appealed seizure of the money under the 2002 Act. Judges: Richards LJ, MacKay J Citations: [2008] EWHC 1651 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Immigration Act 1971, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime, … Continue reading Greater Manchester Police, Regina (on the Application of) v City of Salford Magistrates Court: Admn 21 Jul 2008

Wiltshire Constabulary v McDonagh: QBD 8 Apr 2008

The claimant said that the retention by the police of items belonging to her infringed her human rights. Judges: Plender J Citations: [2008] EWHC 654 (QB) Links: Bailii Statutes: Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 22(1), European Convention on Human Rights 8, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 340(3) Police, Human Rights Updated: 17 July 2022; … Continue reading Wiltshire Constabulary v McDonagh: QBD 8 Apr 2008

Scottish Ministers v Stirton and Another: SCS 5 Feb 2008

Application for an interim administration order in terms of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and for warrant for inhibition and arrestment Citations: [2008] ScotCS CSOH – 20 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Jurisdiction: Scotland Cited by: See Also – Scottish Ministers v Stirton and Another SCS 30-Apr-2009 . .See Also – … Continue reading Scottish Ministers v Stirton and Another: SCS 5 Feb 2008

Parkinson, Regina v: CACD 10 Jul 2015

Judges: Davis LJ , Supperstone J, Judge Zeidman QC Citations: [2015] EWCA Crim 1448, [2015] WLR(D) 302 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 13 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.556383

Olupitan and Another v Director of the Assets Recovery Agency: CA 22 Feb 2008

The claimant challenged seizure of cash he was carrying. The court had concluded from its volume that it represented the proceeds of crime. Held: Carnwath LJ said: ‘I agree with Sullivan J (in Green) that the Director need not allege the commission of any specific criminal offence, provided there are set out the matters alleged … Continue reading Olupitan and Another v Director of the Assets Recovery Agency: CA 22 Feb 2008

In re Al Zayat: Misc 7 Mar 2008

Re-hearing of an application by Mr Al Zayat to discharge a Restraint Order, Judges: Hon Mr Justice Gross Citations: [2008] EW Misc 3 (EWCCT), [2008] Lloyd’s Rep FC 390 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (External Requests and Orders) Order 2005 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.406760

Nadarajah v Regina: CACD 16 Nov 2007

The defendant appealed against a confiscation order made following his conviction for conspiracy to supply controlled drugs. Judges: Pill LJ, Hedley LJ, Sir Richard Curtis Citations: [2007] EWCA Crim 2688 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Attorney General Reference Nos 99, 100, 101 and 102 of … Continue reading Nadarajah v Regina: CACD 16 Nov 2007

Neuberg (Karen), Regina v: CACD 13 Jul 2007

The Act applied to a company which was being operated in breach of section 216 of the Insolvency Act which forbids the use of a prohibited trading style. Citations: [2007] EWCA Crim 1994 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Cited by: Cited – Basso and Another v Regina CACD 19-May-2010 The defendants had … Continue reading Neuberg (Karen), Regina v: CACD 13 Jul 2007

Merseyside Police v Hickman and Another: Admn 1 Mar 2006

Cash had been seized by the police under the 1984 Act. It was later seized also under the 2003 Act. The respondent said this was unlawful. Held: The forfeited money could be seized again under the 2003 Act. The 2002 Act allowed appropriate assets to be siezed at any time. Judges: Mittng J Citations: [2006] … Continue reading Merseyside Police v Hickman and Another: Admn 1 Mar 2006

Irwin Mitchell (a Firm) v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office and Another: CACD 30 Jul 2008

The solicitors had held andpound;5,000 on account of their fees for representing the defendant when he later became subject to a criminal restraint order. They wrote to the respondents saying that they intended to transfer the fees to satisfy their interim account. The respondents refused. The judge had refused to vary the order. Held: The … Continue reading Irwin Mitchell (a Firm) v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office and Another: CACD 30 Jul 2008

Bakewell, Regina v: CACD 11 Jan 2006

The defendant faced allegations of evading duty on the importing of substantial quantities of cigarettes. A confiscation order was made. HMRC appealed saying it was too small a sum. Held: ‘the liability of a smuggler who evades duty which he becomes liable to pay on importation is a pecuniary advantage obtained rendering him liable to … Continue reading Bakewell, Regina v: CACD 11 Jan 2006

Squirrell Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc: ChD 22 Apr 2005

The court conisdered the effects of the provisions of the 2002 Act to be to ‘force a party in NatWest’s position to report its suspicions to the relevant authorities and not to move suspect funds or property either for seven working days or, if a notice of refusal is sent by the relevant authority, for … Continue reading Squirrell Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc: ChD 22 Apr 2005

Singh v Director of the Assets Recovery Agency: CA 17 May 2005

The defendant had successfully appealed a confiscation order which had been made without jurisdiction, but now claimed that that exempted those assets from later civil proceedings to recover the criminal proceeds. Held: The failure of the previous criminal confiscation proceedings did not prevent the later making of civil recovery orders. The exceptions allowed under section … Continue reading Singh v Director of the Assets Recovery Agency: CA 17 May 2005

Regina v Soneji and Bullen: HL 21 Jul 2005

The defendants had had confiscation orders made against them. They had appealed on the basis that the orders were made more than six months after sentence. The prosecutor now appealed saying that the fact that the order were not timely did not invalidate them. Held: The appeal was allowed. The confiscation orders made by the … Continue reading Regina v Soneji and Bullen: HL 21 Jul 2005

Regina v S: CACD 4 Apr 2019

Appeal brought with the leave of the single judge against an order made under s.22(4)(a) Citations: [2019] EWCA Crim 569 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 18 June 2022; Ref: scu.635653

King v The Serious Fraud Office: CACD 18 Mar 2008

Restraint and Disclosure orders had been made on without notice applications at the request of South Africa. The applicant appealed a refusal of their discharge. Held: Such orders did not apply to the applicant’s assets in Scotland. The orders were quashed and new orders substituted restricting their ambit to England and Wales. Judges: Lord Justice … Continue reading King v The Serious Fraud Office: CACD 18 Mar 2008

Moss, Regina v: CACD 26 Mar 2019

Appeal as to proposed enforcement of domestic confiscation orders. Citations: [2019] EWCA Crim 501 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Criminal Justice and Data Protection (Protocol No. 36) Regulations 2014 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.634822

Assets Recovery Agency, Regina (on the Application Of) v He and Another: Admn 7 Dec 2004

Application was made for an interim receiving order pending resolution of criminal proceedings. Collins J said: ‘the approach of the Director must be to let criminal proceedings take precedence, as it were, and only act if such proceedings are either not being taken or for any reason may have failed, if notwithstanding their failure or … Continue reading Assets Recovery Agency, Regina (on the Application Of) v He and Another: Admn 7 Dec 2004

Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank Plc: QBD 18 Jul 2018

Claims following freezing of the claimant’s bank accounts after Suspicious Activity Report by the bank to the National Crime Agency, and then closure of the accounts. Held: The defendant’s application to have the claim struck out failed. The claimants request for copies of the SARs was granted: ‘ inspection is necessary for the fair disposal … Continue reading Lonsdale v National Westminster Bank Plc: QBD 18 Jul 2018