Site icon swarb.co.uk

Olsson v Sweden (No 2): ECHR 27 Nov 1992

Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Lack of jurisdiction; No violation of Art. 6-1; No violation of Art. 8; Violation of Art. 8; Violation of Art. 6-1 (access); No separate issue under Art. 53; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses partial award – domestic proceedings; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings

Citations:

13441/87, [1992] ECHR 75

Links:

Worldlii, Bailii

Jurisdiction:

Human Rights

Cited by:

CitedKeegan v United Kingdom ECHR 18-Jul-2006
The claimant had been the subject of a raid by armed police on his home. The raid was a mistake. He complained that the English legal system, in rejecting his claim had not allowed him to assert that the police action had been disproportionate.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.165221

Exit mobile version