When deciding whether to order security for costs, the possibility or probability that the plaintiff company will be deterred from pursuing its claim is not the sole deciding factor.
Judges:
Bingham LJ
Citations:
[1993] BCLC 474
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Keary Developments v Tarmac Constructions CA 1995
The court set out the principles to be applied by the court upon an application for security for costs.
1. The court has a complete discretion whether to order security, and accordingly it will act in the light of all the relevant . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Costs, Litigation Practice
Updated: 17 May 2022; Ref: scu.225882