Okotcha v Voest Alpine Intertrading GmbH: CA 1993

When deciding whether to order security for costs, the possibility or probability that the plaintiff company will be deterred from pursuing its claim is not the sole deciding factor.
Bingham LJ
[1993] BCLC 474
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedKeary Developments v Tarmac Constructions CA 1995
The court set out the principles to be applied by the court upon an application for security for costs.
1. The court has a complete discretion whether to order security, and accordingly it will act in the light of all the relevant . .
[1995] 3 All ER 534

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 15 December 2020; Ref: scu.225882