Occidental Worldwide Investment Corporation v Skibs A/S Avanti (The Siboen and Sibotre): 1976

The effect of a rescission of a compromise agreement settling the dispute may be to revive the original agreement. As to the liability of a principal for misrepresentations by his agent: ‘If one agent makes a fraudulent statement to another agent, intending the latter to pass the statement on to a third party, and this done, the principal will be liable; for in these circumstances the first agent is guilty of the complete tort of fraudulent misrepresentation, the second agent being his innocent agent.’
Exemplary damages are not available for breach of contract even if a contract breaker has made a similarly cynical calculation that it will benefit him more to break a contract than to perform it.
As to the establishment of economic duress, Kerr J said that in a contractual situation commercial pressure is not enough. There must be present some factor ‘which could in law be regarded as a coercion of his will so as to vitiate his consent.’

Judges:

Kerr J

Citations:

[1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293

Cited by:

CitedMCI Worldcom International Inc v Primus Telecommunications Inc ComC 25-Sep-2003
The claimant sought judgment, and the defendant leave to amend its defence. The question was whether the proposed defence had any reasonable prospect of success.
Held: The misrepresentation alleged was made by the claimant’s in-house . .
CitedCrystal Palace FC (2000) Ltd v Dowie QBD 14-Jun-2007
The parties had agreed a compromise on the leaving of the defendant as manager. The club now said that the agreement had been obtained by fraudulent misrepresentation. He had been released but had said he had not had contact with another London club . .
CitedDevenish Nutrition Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Sa (France) and others CA 14-Oct-2008
The defendant had been involved in price fixing arrangements, and the claimant sought damages for breach of its proprietary rights. The claimant appealed refusal of an award an account of profits for what was akin to a breach of statutory duty.
CitedPao On and Others v Lau Yiu Long and Others PC 9-Apr-1979
(Hong Kong) The board was asked whether a contract of guarantee had been obtained by duress.
Held: Lord Scarman said: ‘Duress, whatever form it takes, is a coercion of the will so as to vitiate consent. Their Lordships agree with the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract, Damages

Updated: 29 April 2022; Ref: scu.186445