The court set out the test for a valid counter-notice: ‘namely that the counternotice should be in terms which are sufficiently clear to bring home to the ordinary landlord that the tenant is purporting to exercise his right . . ‘
Judges:
Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson V-C
Citations:
[1985] 51 PandCR 310
Cited by:
Cited – Rennie v Westbury Homes (Holdings) Ltd ChD 7-Feb-2007
The parties had entered into an option agreement for development of land. The developer purported to exercise an option extendng the applicable period, but having accepted the funds, the land owner denied that it had been validly exercised.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Contract
Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.248458