EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Whistleblowing
Appeal on various grounds against the refusal of an Employment Tribunal to make an award of aggravated damages where the Appellant had been found to have suffered detriment in being excluded from his work as a hospital consultant urologist. Held (amongst other grounds of appeal rejected) that an Employment Tribunal is only required to consider such factors in support of the claim for aggravated damages as are argued before it and not trawl through the evidence to consider points not made to it in argument. In any event the Employment Tribunal had correctly applied Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Shaw UKEAT/0125/11/ZT, 29 November 2011.
Judges:
Birtles J
Citations:
[2012] UKEAT 0252 – 11 – 0703
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 05 October 2022; Ref: scu.451893