The defendant who had had 75 cats in her home with consequences that they had been not well looked after was convicted of animal cruelty. She had been ‘given a conditional discharge’, one of the conditions being that she could not thereafter look after more than two cats at any one time.
 EWHC 338 (Admin)
England and Wales
Cited – Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals v Chester Crown Court Admn 17-May-2006
Defendants had been convicted of maltreatment of horses. The crown court had overturned a permanent ban on keeping horses, substituting a limit of keeping 25 horses with a conditional discharge. The prosecutor now appealed.
Held: The court had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.223493