An employee entered into a compromise agreement having lost his employment. He was later sued by his employer but counterclaimed for stigma damages against the employer. It was held that the release could not bind the employee in respect of matters of which he was unaware at the time of the agreement, and where the bank was seeking to take advantage of that ignorance.
Citations:
Gazette 25-May-2000
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal from – Naeem v Bank of Credit and Commerce Admn 19-Apr-2000
. .
Cited by:
Appealed to – Naeem v Bank of Credit and Commerce Admn 19-Apr-2000
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.84155