Site icon swarb.co.uk

Nadine Paquay v Societe d’architectes Hoet + Minne SPRL (Social Policy): ECJ 11 Oct 2007

Europa Social policy ‘Protection of pregnant women’ Directive 92/85/EEC ‘Article 10’ Prohibition on dismissal from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of maternity leave ‘Period of protection Decision to dismiss a female worker during that period of protection’ Notification and implementation of the decision to dismiss after the expiry of that period ‘ Equal treatment for male and female workers ‘ Directive 76/207/EEC’ Articles 2(1), 5(1), and 6 ‘Direct discrimination on grounds of sex’ Sanctions.

Citations:

C-460/06, [2007] EUECJ C-460/06, [2008] 1 CMLR 12, [2008] ICR 420

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Council Directive 76/207

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

CitedOyarce v Cheshire County Council CA 2-May-2008
The court was asked as to whether the provisions for the reversal of the burden of proof in discrimination cases was limited to findings of discrimination or extended also to issues of victimisation, and as to whether section 5A had properly . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Discrimination

Updated: 17 July 2022; Ref: scu.259795

Exit mobile version