EAT CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT: Whether established
Tribunal Chairman correct not to imply contract between agency worker and end user.
 UKEAT 0132 – 08 – 2608
Employment Rights Act 1996
Appeal from – Muschett v HM Prison Service CA 2-Feb-2010
The claimant had been employed through an employment agency to carry out work for the respondent. He appealed against dismissal of his appeal against a ruling that he was not a worker for the respondent under the 1996 Act. He said that the . .
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 February 2021; Ref: scu.277153