NIIT In these proceedings, the claimant made a claim against Compartmentation and against NI, in respect of a redundancy payment. He also sought a declaration, pursuant to Article 205 of the Employment Rights (NI) Order 1996 (‘the 1996 Order’), that Compartmentation or NI had become liable to make a redundancy payment to him in March 2011. Those particular claims, and that particular application, were the subject of a hearing on 3 October 2011. The outcomes of that hearing were as follows:
(1) I decided that the claimant’s redundancy payment claim against Compartmentation was not well-founded.
(2) I decided that the claimant’s redundancy pay claim against NI was well-founded.
(3) I decided, pursuant to Article 205 of the 1996 Order, that NI had become liable to make a redundancy payment to the claimant.
Citations:
[2012] NIIT 00280 – 11IT
Links:
Citing:
See Also – Murray v Firecrest Compartmentation Ltd Firecrest (NI) Ltd Department for Employment and Learning NIIT 7-Oct-2011
NIIT (A) The claimant’s redundancy payment claim against Firecrest Compartmentation Ltd is not well-founded and accordingly it is dismissed.
(B) I am satisfied that the claimant is entitled to a redundancy . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Northern Ireland, Employment
Updated: 13 November 2022; Ref: scu.469246